Chewing the Fat about AIDS - Arts Today with Stephen Holden
|
|
The disappearance of
AIDS as a subject for movies and television drama at the end of the 90s is
hardly surprising. Hollywood has always had a difficult time confronting
what I call Real Sex and Real Death, as opposed to the escapist prurience,
titillation and shoot-`em-up gore that pass for Eros
and Thanatos there. The few AIDS movies
and television dramas that were made at the height of the epidemic tended
to be high-minded, disease-of-the-week dramas awash in
teary-eyed-sanctimony-autumn leaves drifting and rain streaming down
windowpanes. Picture the most common variant: a young, cute, white
affluent gay man returns to his parents' home to die. Typically, he finds
an understanding mother and an intolerant father, and achieves some
partial resolution before the inevitable, deadly denouement. In other
words, they laugh, they cry, they come to terms.
|
|
But as soon as drugs
prolonging the lives of people with AIDS appeared on the market, Hollywood
sighed a collective Whew! and turned its back on AIDS. Yes, the advances
in AIDS treatment and the development of protease inhibitors that appear
(for some and for now, at least) to have made AIDS a manageable disease
are cause for rejoicing. But they have allowed American mass culture to
bury its head in the sand and to pretend the epidemic is not over.
The Gulf
War and the war in Kosovo are
"over," too, but that doesn't mean that the problems in Iraq and the
Balkans have disappeared. Saddam
Hussein and Slobodan
Milosevic remain in power.
By the same token, there is no vaccine or cure for AIDS. And in Third
World countries where expensive treatments are unaffordable to millions
infected with HIV, the pandemic rages on. The only times we hear about it
are in occasional summary articles or newscasts tallying up the infected,
giving the percentages of those infected in various countries, and
offering grim projections of future fatalities.
One measure of the
disparity between real life and Hollywood has been the movie industry's
duplicitous response to the AIDS crisis. A significant percentage of
Hollywood's middle-management is gay, and the movie industry has suffered
serious losses from AIDS. To its credit, the industry has raised tens of
millions of dollars for AIDS charities. But at the same time, paranoid
actors and film makers are loath to be "outed" as either gay or
HIV-positive. The disparity between these real lives and the industry's
AIDS-phobic product says a great deal about the values that go into
creating that product. For in Entertainment Nation, nobody wants to be
bummed out. And in Entertainment Nation, Real Sex (the kind that's
complicated, messy, wet and that can transmit disease) and Real Death (the
kind that's slow, painful, unglamorous) are box office poison.
Economics are one reason
why the theater, not movies, television, or pop music, has been the only
popular art form to confront AIDS directly and honestly. William
Hoffman's "As Is" and Larry Kramer's "The Normal
Heart" began a cycle of impassioned, realistic AIDS plays that reached
its pinnacle with Tony
Kushner's Pulitzer Prize-winning epic, "Angels In America." These plays
were hits and went on to have productions around the country. Yet none has
been made into a Hollywood film. It's the difference between risking
$50,000 to $500,000 to produce a serious play and $50 million to make a
movie, the difference between a niche- and a mass audience.
The only place to find
films that have dealt realistically with AIDS, is to scour the margins of
American mass culture. "Parting Glances," "Longtime Companion," "It's My
Party," and the movie of Paul Rudnick's hit stage comedy "Jeffrey," are
among the few American independent films that deal directly with the
epidemic and its devastating toll. But even here, the demographics are
almost entirely limited to white, middle-class gay men and their problems.
It's not really much different in Europe or elsewhere.
Mainstream Hollywood's one
and only high-end AIDS drama, Jonathan Demme's "Philadelphia," could be
described as the "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" of AIDS dramas and
gay-themed Hollywood films in general. To make its subject palatable, the
hero, a gay attorney with AIDS fighting his dismissal from a white-shoe
firm on grounds of discrimination, was played by Hollywood's most likable
heterosexual everyman, Tom Hanks. Although he was given a lover (avowedly
straight actor Antonio Banderas), the two were not allowed to kiss on the
screen. Hanks's character, we were told, contracted AIDS from a single
indiscretion in a movie theater(!). "Philadelphia" was a big hit that
probably helped nudge along the causes of gay civil rights and safer-sex
education. But in its prim sanitized way, it also helped set the tone for
the post-AIDS culture of denial. That new squeamishness is palpable in a
movie like "Boogie Nights," a subtly
anti-sexual, anti-hedonistic look back at the 70s porno industry.
Pity poor Hollywood, which
has lost sight of the difference between box office success and artistic
merit. And pity audiences starved for films that aren't market tested to
make sure there's nothing discomfiting in them . Peddling sexual fantasy
has always been Hollywood's bread and butter, and late-90s movies are more
obsessed than ever before with pretty bodies and titillating sex talk. But
Real Sex of the kind in which you feel a genuine erotic heat and loss of
control on the screen is scarcer than at any time since the early 60s.
Late-90s Hollywood sex is all posing and teasing: it's lip gloss and no
saliva. It's also 99 and 44/100th percent heterosexual.
As far as movie subject
matter goes, the AIDS epidemic did accomplish one thing: It largely buried
the corny disease of the week sub-genre. Wouldn't it be wonderful to be
able to say something more positive? That the AIDS epidemic is gone but
not forgotten? Unfortunately, it's the other way around in American
popular culture. AIDS is forgotten, but it certainly isn't gone.
Stephen Holden is a film and music critic for the "New York Times".
The symposium "panelists'" -
Chris Dohse, Stephen Holden, Eileen Myles, and Nancy Princenthal.
|
|
|